St. Paul Minnesota USA - BNSF Railway and CPKC, the two largest railroads in Minnesota, do not plan
to make payments of approximately US$1 million to the state required by a law passed last year, saying the state
legislation is "pre-empted by federal law."
KSTP-TV reports the two railroads notified the Minnesota Department of Public Safety of the decision in letters sent
last month.
The fees were established by the final version of a bill introduced the day after a derailment and fire in Raymond,
Minnesota.
It requires the state to assess fees, based on route miles in the state, to all railroads to pay for six rail safety
inspector positions.
It also requires railroads to offer safety training to fire departments and local emergency management organizations
and sets a 15 minute limit for railroads to notify first responders of incidents involving hazardous materials, among
other provisions.
As part of a broader transportation finance and policy bill, it passed the state's House 69-58, the Senate 34-32, and
was signed by Governor Tim Walz last May.
State Sen. Scott Dibble (Democratic-Farmer-Labor Party, Minneapolis) told the station the railroads' decision was
"like a bolt out of the blue and a complete shock."
The railroads, asked to comment, referred the station to the Minnesota Regional Railroads Association, which KSTP says
responded with a lengthy statement that noted railroads already train first responders, that rail incidents in the
state are down 46 percent, and that the fee is unfair because the state does not collect similar assessments from other
modes of transportation handling hazardous materials.
Dibble dismissed the claim that the legislation is illegal, saying "the railroads are always resisting any efforts
we make toward public safety improvements by citing federal preemption. They're almost always wrong, and I'm sure
they're wrong in this case, as well."
He said the state may have to file a lawsuit if the railroads refuse to pay.
Author unknown.
(likely no image with original article)
(usually because it's been seen before)
provisions in Section 29 of the
Canadian Copyright Modernization Act.