Ottawa Ontario - Labour Minister Steven MacKinnon has rejected CN's request for binding arbitration
in the company's labour dispute with Teamsters Canada Rail Conference (TCRC), one week before a lockout could shut down
the rail network.
"I would like to clarify that it is your shared responsibility, CN and the TCRC, to negotiate in good faith and
work diligently towards a new collective agreement," MacKinnon wrote in a letter obtained by CBC
News.
The minister added that federal mediators remain available to both parties as negotiations continue.
"I trust that with continued effort, an agreement can be achieved promptly. The government firmly believes in the
collective bargaining process and trusts that mutually beneficial agreements are within reach at the bargaining
table," MacKinnon wrote.
When asked for further comment, a representative of MacKinnon's office said the statement in the letter
stands.
In a media statement, CN spokesperson Jonathan Abecassis said the company is "disappointed" in the minister's
decision and the company has made four offers since January.
"While we are disappointed the minister is choosing not use section 107 of the Canada Labour Code at this time, we
hope TCRC will listen to the minister's strong message that they must get serious and engage meaningfully at the
negotiating table. The minister must reconsider his decision if they don't," he wrote.
Under the Canada Labour Code, the minister has the power to send parties in a labour dispute to binding arbitration,
which would prevent a work stoppage.
This section was most recently used on 26 Jun 2024 by then-labour minister Seamus O'Regan to order binding arbitration
between WestJet mechanics and the airline.
If a settlement is not reached by midnight on 22 Aug 2024 CN maintains it will have "no choice" but to lock
out employees.
That date is the end of a cooling-off period ordered by the Canada Industrial Relations Board (CIRB) after they ruled
rail work is not an essential service under the labour code.
In a media statement, the TCRC said that it agrees with the minister's conclusion that a negotiated settlement is
within reach.
"From the very beginning, rail workers have only ever sought a fair and equitable agreement. Unfortunately, both
rail companies are demanding concessions that could tear families apart or jeopardize rail safety. Rail workers have
fought for a safer and more humane industry for decades, and we will not accept moving backwards," said TCRC
president Paul Boucher.
CPKC, which is in separate negotiations with TCRC, has also signaled its intention to lock out employees if a deal is
not reached by 22 Aug 2024.
CPKC says it has offered to enter binding arbitration with the union but has not made a request for ministerial
intervention.
Both railways have started to shut down parts of their operations in advance of the potential lockouts.
MacKinnon held meetings with all parties on 5 Aug 2024 and urged them to reach negotiated settlements to avoid supply
line disruptions.
On Wednesday, after meeting with TCRC, NDP labour critic Matthew Green sent a letter to MacKinnon calling on the
minister to not order binding arbitration.
"Using the section 107 to force them into binding arbitration takes the union's ability to negotiate with all of
their tools. It is constitutionally protected that unions have the right to withdraw their labour from management, from
corporations, when they're in negotiations. Corporations consistently drag it out to the last minute and manufacture a
crisis," Green told CBC News.
Alberta Premier Danielle Smith publicly called on MacKinnon to do everything in the government's power to prevent a
work stoppage in order to avoid "disastrous" economic impacts.
Saskatchewan Transportation Minister Lori Carr also sent a letter to MacKinnon with a similar request.
Following the CIRB ruling last week, the Business Council of Canada sent a letter to the minister's office, co-signed
by nearly 100 business groups and industry associations, urging federal intervention to prevent a supply line
shutdown.
Author unknown.
(likely no image with original article)
(usually because it's been seen before)
provisions in Section 29 of the
Canadian Copyright Modernization Act.