External link
 Photo
The Bergen Cut-Off rail bridge - Date unknown Photographer unknown.
7 June 2017
The Bergen Cut-Off


Winnipeg Manitoba - While crossing over the Kildonan Settlers Bridge in Winnipeg, if you look south, you catch a glimpse of a disused railway swing bridge perched on its pier in the middle of the Red River.
 
At this point, many readers will be thinking, "My sainted aunt! Writing an article about an abandoned bridge in Winnipeg. How does this relate to agriculture? They must have lost their minds at the Manitoba Agricultural Museum. What is next?"
 
However, the readers will be astonished to learn the disused bridge has an agricultural connection.
 
It is a remnant of the Canadian Pacific Railway's (CP) Bergen Cut-Off which was a rail line meant to reroute grain traffic around CP's yards and main line in Winnipeg as these facilities were quite congested in the pre-First World War era.
 
The rapid expansion of cultivation on the Prairies in the period 1895 to 1910 posed huge problems for the CP, Canadian Northern Pacific (CNoP), and Grand Trunk Pacific (GTP) railways which struggled with the grain traffic these railways were expected to handle from the Prairies to the Lakehead in the fall.
 
This congestion continued as the railways, after the freeze-up at the Lakehead in the late fall, were then faced with a winter movement of grain to the ice-free ports on the St. Lawrence and on the Eastern Seaboard.
 
The three railways added more boxcars and locomotives in order to handle the exploding grain traffic.
 
As well as western grain traffic, the Canadian railways at this time also enjoyed substantial "bridge" traffic resulting from the need to move goods from Pacific ports to Atlantic ports and vice versa.
 
The Canadian railways were the only railways in North America to run from the Atlantic to the Pacific and so were ideal to handle the substantial volume of goods moving between Asia and Europe.
 
While some cargoes moved by vessel from Europe to Asia and vice versa, for various reasons European and Asian shippers felt it was advisable to move a significant volume of goods by vessel to a Canadian port and then move it by rail to the other coast for reloading onto a vessel and its final destination.
 
This route was probably faster than an all-water route at the time.
 
But whatever the reasons, this traffic was considerable in volume and was very profitable to CP, CNoP, and GTP.
 
CP faced enormous pressure in 1911 as a result of the above factors.
 
Winnipeg posed problems for the CP as its main line, rail yards, and facilities in the city were congested with traffic but were also surrounded by a rapidly growing city which constrained the CP's ability to improve its facilities.
 
The CP came up with an ambitious plan that would see the CP bypass Winnipeg to the north with a rail line plus the plan would also result in a thoroughly modern rail yard by 1910 standards, set up to handle large numbers of boxcars every day.
 
This plan would greatly ease CP's problems in Winnipeg with its congested Winnipeg facilities.
 
Work on this plan actively began in 1911.
 
The Bergen Cut-Off ran between a point called Norcan on CP's Keewatin subdivision, east of Winnipeg, and Woodman Tower on the CPR's Carberry Subdivision which is west of Winnipeg.
 
The line was well north of Winnipeg at the time and ran through what was largely farmland in 1911.
 
The new rail line required a bridge over the Red River which, being a navigable river at the time, meant the bridge had to include a swing section to allow vessels to pass.
 
The line was double tracked, including the bridge.
 
Just east of Norcan, CP constructed the North Transcona yard.
 
The yard was a complicated affair which can be best described as double sided.
 
One side consisted of an eastbound receiving yard with 20 tracks and an eastbound classification and departure yard with 20 tracks.
 
Each track could hold 72 cars.
 
A 35 foot high hump track separated the receiving yard and the classification and departure yard.
 
Cars in the receiving yard were pushed over the hump and rolled down into the classification and departure yard and were directed to various tracks in this yard to make up trains going to a single destination.
 
A "car rider" rode the car down the hump to operate the car's brakes and prevent the car from rolling too fast into the cars already in the track.
 
The other side of the yard was identical, except this side handled the westbound traffic.
 
In between the east and westbound yards were repair, icing, transfer, caboose storage, and coal storage tracks.
 
This area also held a "ready for service" locomotive yard, a 44 stall roundhouse, a coal dock to fuel locomotives, water tower, and other locomotive servicing facilities.
 
The facility could be expanded in a second phase to a total of 30 tracks in both receiving yards and 40 tracks in both classification/departure yards.
 
The capacity of the yard in the first phase was 7,500 of the standard 36 foot boxcars with an ultimate capacity of 13,136 boxcars with the addition of the second phase.
 
An early one-day record for the North Transcona yard was the handling of 2,000 boxcars during a fall grain "rush."
 
However, the second phase was never built for several reasons.
 
The opening of the Panama Canal resulted in CP losing the "bridge" traffic moving between the Atlantic and Pacific Coasts as the canal substantially eased vessel movement between Asia and Europe and made vessel movement more economical than the previous vessel-rail-vessel route.
 
CP experienced a substantial downturn in traffic as a result.
 
As well, the First World War resulted in a substantial decrease in grain moving through the Lakehead to Europe.
 
After the war, Vancouver opened up as a grain export port, resulting in a long-term declining demand for grain movement to the Lakehead.
 
A further problem surfaced with the soil conditions in the area of the North Transcona yard proving unable to support large structures.
 
CP improved its facilities in Winnipeg, which, when combined with the reduced traffic through Winnipeg, resulted in the Bergen Cut-Off seeing much less traffic than expected.
 
The economic Depression of the 1930s resulted in a severe downturn in traffic with the result that the cut-off was surplus to needs.
 
CP removed the line sometime after 1933 but left in place the bridge over the Red River.
 
The yard was not completely removed at the time with the remnants serving as a storage facility however, at this time, little remains of the yard.
 
For some reason, the rail bridge was left spanning the river other than having its heavy creosoted timber deck removed.
 
The Manitoba Agricultural Museum acknowledges the material for this release was obtained from the book "The Railways of Winnipeg, Volume Two", with the permission of the author, Mr. Fred Headon.
 
Alex Campbell.

Quoted under the provisions in Section 29
of the Canadian Copyright Modernization Act.
 Internal link          Internal link
 Image