This web page requires a JavaScript enabled browser.
OKthePK.ca
 
 


 Vol. 17 No. 9
 September, 1987

Stay Safe in 87
 

CTC Clears Railway for Using Cars to Protect Bridge


Typical St. John River bridge.
 
 
Ottawa Ontario - The Canadian Transport Commission's Railway Transport Committee (RTC) says CP Rail was not at fault when the railway used a number of cars in an attempt to stabilize a bridge over the Saint John River at Perth-Andover, New Brunswick, on 2 Apr 1987.
 
The bridge and the cars eventually were swept away by an ice jam and flood waters.
 
The ice jam and high water on the bridge's superstructure pushed five 49-metre trusses and one 18-metre girder off its foundations, dumping 17 freight cars into the river. Thirteen of the cars contained fertilizers, which were not considered or regulated as dangerous goods by the RTC.
 
CP Rail used loaded railway cars to stabilize the same bridge during flooding in 1976. The action taken by the railway at that time was credited with saving the bridge, the RTC said.
 
The RTC report said that although the railway's selection of fertilizer cars to stabilize the bridge on 2 Apr 1987 was not a preferable one, the report said it was the only available choice under the circumstances. Twenty-three cars loaded with wood chips were located 45 kilometres away, but were cut-off by ice and flood waters.
 
The RTC accident report contained no recommendations, other than the observation that the terms of reference of the Canada-New Brunswick Flood Damage Reduction Program should be reviewed and possibly enlarged with particular attention given to ice jam formation and control.
 

Ice jam endangering a typical St. John River bridge.
 
 

Typical St. John River bridge collapse due to ice jam and flood.
 
 
As a result of damage to two CP Rail's bridges during this spring break-up and flood they made application to abandon the Shogomoc Subdivision in New Brunswick which included these briges over the St. John River. On 12 May 1989 under Order No. 1989-R-90 approval was granted to abandon the subdivision because there was no reasonable probability of the branch lines becoming economic in the foreseeable future. Furthermore, if the line were to be restored to a condition enabling rail service to resume over the portions of the Subdivision included in the application, CP Rail, or the lessor, would be required to invest considerable sums to replace the two washed-out bridges at mileage 54.0 and mileage 100.5.

 
This CP Rail News article is copyright 1987 by the Canadian Pacific Railway and is reprinted here with their permission. All photographs, logos, and trademarks are the property of the Canadian Pacific Railway Company.
 
 
http://www.okthepk.ca     Victoria British Columbia Canada