This web page requires a JavaScript enabled browser.
OKthePK.ca
 
 

 Home
 
2006

 Off-site link
 
8 November 2006

Freehold Mineral Owners Allege Multi-Billion Dollar Ploy by Encana to Deprive Natural Gas Rights Sold to Alberta Pioneers

Calgary Alberta - In the early 1900's, the Canadian Pacific Railway Company (the CPR) sold farm-sized parcels of its railway grant lands to Alberta's early homesteaders. The railway grant lands included rights to subsurface coal, petroleum and natural gas but, in land sales to settlers in the 1902 - 1912 period the CPR reserved only coal or coal and petroleum rights for itself. The homesteaders acquired the surface and the natural gas rights. This gave rise to "split title" lands. According to Alberta's highest court, at the time the CPR was operating under the "mistaken belief natural gas was a worthless and noxious substance". Now natural gas is a highly valuable commodity and Encana Corp., the CPR's successor, wants it back.
 
According to the Alberta Energy and Utilities Board (the EUB), there are 500 trillion cubic feet of natural gas in place in the subsurface coals of Alberta. The areas identified by the EUB as most prospective for development of the multi-billion dollar coal bed methane resource include more than two million acres of split title lands, most of which are owned by ordinary Albertans.
 
The Freehold Owners Association (FHOA) represents the interests of thousands of individuals who are the descendants of the Province's earliest settlers and hold title to natural gas beneath split title lands. FHOA is currently intervening in an EUB hearing to determine the entitlement to coal bed methane beneath these lands.
 
Without producing one shred of documentary evidence, Encana claims that coal bed methane had commercial value to the CPR in the early 1900's. Encana also claims the CPR retained the natural gas in coal because it recognized that natural gas was dangerous and wanted to protect the settlers. And coal bed methane in the ground is not really gas at all, it is either liquid-like or solid claims Encana's technical expert.
 
And what does Encana want from the EUB? On 30 May 2006, the EUB announced a moratorium on drilling on split title lands pending its ruling on CBM entitlement. Encana wants the EUB to extend this moratorium until a court decides who owns coal bed methane or the natural gas owners agree to Encana's terms for sharing the resource.
 
David Speirs, Chairman of the Freehold Owners Association's (FHOA's) Technical Sub-Committee says:  "Encana has acknowledged in the hearing that it may take a decade or more for a judicial decision on coal bed methane ownership. If the EUB grants Encana's request for an indefinite extension of the drilling moratorium, individual freehold owners of natural gas whose resources are being drained by wells on adjacent lands will have no choice but to accede to the demands of Encana."
 
Else Pedersen, FHOA's President says:  "Encana holds itself out as a champion of open, honest and ethical business practices. It seems to me that Encana is using the regulatory process to further its own business interests at the expense of thousands of individual Albertans."
 
The coal bed methane issue will be one of the topics on the agenda at FHOA's next mineral rights information seminar to be held at Festival Place, Sherwood Park on the evening of 14 Nov 2006.
 
 
http://www.okthepk.ca     Victoria British Columbia Canada