Banff Alberta - A study looking at 646 wildlife deaths on railway tracks in Banff and Yoho national parks in Alberta and British Columbia
has found that train speed was one of the biggest factors.
The research, published earlier this week in Nature's Scientific Reports, studied animals killed by trains between 1995 and 2018, 59 bears, 27 wolves, coyotes,
cougars, lynx, and 560 deer, elk, moose, and sheep.
"The top predictor was train speed. More animals died where trains were travelling faster. Next was distance to water, then the amount of water near the
site, and then curvature in the tracks," said lead author Colleen Cassady St. Clair, a biological sciences professor at the University of
Alberta.
Train speed and track curvature, she said, make it difficult for wildlife to detect trains, while being close to water, particularly a lot of water, hinders
their ability to get off the tracks before being hit.
The study builds on a five-year research project funded by Parks Canada and Canadian Pacific Railway from 2010 to 2015 that focused on grizzly bears being
struck by trains in the same two parks.
It concluded that giving grizzlies better travel paths and sightlines along the railway was the best way to keep them safe.
Cassady St. Clair said she hopes the latest study "will make it possible to identify types and locations for mitigations that will reduce the problems for
all wildlife, not just grizzly bears."
The research concludes effective mitigation could address train speed and the ability of wildlife to see trains, especially at curves in tracks near
water.
Canadian Pacific noted in a statement Friday that the company has worked with Parks Canada for the last decade to learn more about how wildlife interacts with
the railway.
"CP has engaged with Parks Canada and the University of Alberta throughout this program to ensure the mitigation measures CP implemented were based on
science," it said.
The statement didn't address whether the company would consider reducing train speeds.
Co-author Jesse Whittington, a wildlife ecologist for Banff National Park, said trains are one of the leading causes of death for animals in the two
parks.
"The trains that travel through Banff and Yoho national parks kill almost 30 animals a year," said Whittington, who added that animals use rail lines
for travel and access to food.
The latest study, he said, helps Parks Canada understand where wildlife are getting killed, why they are getting hit in that location, and the time of year
when they are most likely to get hit.
"Mortality risk was highest in areas where animals had difficulty detecting trains, and where they had difficulty escaping trains. Animals had challenges
detecting trains where trains were travelling fast and in areas with high curvature. Trains can be surprisingly quiet when they are travelling downhill or
coming around a corner," he said.
Whittington gave as an example an adult female grizzly bear killed by a train in September.
She was in an area with a steep slope next to the Bow River.
"There were few places for her to get off the tracks."
The latest study also found that grizzly bears were more likely to be killed in late spring when, Whittington noted, water in the Bow River is often
higher.
Other carnivores and ungulates were more likely to get hit by trains in the winter.
"When we have deep snows, we'll often find elk and deer along the tracks."
Whittington said some of his Parks Canada colleagues have been working to enhance travel routes for animals away from the rail line by creating more trails
through the forest.
The agency's fire crews have also been working to create better wildlife habitat throughout the park with prescribed fires.
"We have a lot of thick shrubs and deadfall that has accumulated over the years that makes it difficult for animals to travel across the landscape. To
date, we've cleared over 50 kilometres of wildlife trails throughout Banff, both in areas around these hot spots, and in other areas that are pinch points.
We're hopeful that will help," he said.
Colette Derworiz.
(because there was no image with original article)
(usually because it's been seen before)
provisions in Section 29 of the Canadian
Copyright Modernization Act.