Crossfield Alberta - A rural resident who lives south of Crossfield is disappointed with Canadian Pacific Railway's (CP) intentions of
cutting down more than 100 trees on her acreage property.
Carla Henderson, who lives on a five acre piece of land near Township Road 282, said CP representatives recently reached out to her, outlining their intent to
cut down a small patch of 30 foot deciduous trees on her land.
According to Henderson, the company argued the trees are a sight line concern, as they block motorists' view of approaching trains, due to a bend in the
railway tracks near the foliage.
A crossing for vehicles is located shortly after the curve, and the trees also prevent conductors from being able to see around the bend.
"It's just frustrating that's the only option they see," said Henderson, adding she has lived on the property for more than 20 years.
"I just feel they're a big company that I'm sure makes oodles of dollars. They go around mountains and trees, so I don't see why there can't be more of a
compromise."
Henderson said she is concerned about the impact the loss of the trees will have on wildlife that live in or frequent the small wooded area, which lies close
to Nose Creek.
She said she has seen moose, deer, and blue heron on her property, as well as beavers and muskrats in the nearby creek.
"We're not that far off the beaten path but there are wildlife that live here. I just think, we don't have a whole lot of trees and forests here. Why get
rid of the ones we do have?" she said.
In a statement to the Rocky View Weekly, CP argued removing the trees is a requirement under Transport Canada's regulations.
"Railways and road authorities have a shared responsibility to ensure public grade crossing sight lines are compliant with Transport Canada's Grade
Crossing Regulations," it read.
"Increased sight lines at crossings can make it easier for all users to view an oncoming train, which improves public safety."
A representative from CP directed the Rocky View Weekly to the federal government's Grade Crossings Regulations, which stipulate "sight lines must be
maintained... including by the removal of trees and brush that obstruct the sight lines."
According to the regulations, "a person who grows trees and brush, or allows them to grow, on land in the vicinity of a grade crossing must remove them if
they obstruct the sight lines."
But Henderson said she is still hopeful a compromise can be reached.
After being contacted by CP, she said she reached out to the Town of Crossfield, Rocky View County, and the Alberta Institute for Wildlife Conservation (AIWC)
in Madden to see if anything could be done to prevent the trees from being cut down.
She said AIWC representatives suggested she reach out to Alberta Fish and Wildlife.
However, Henderson said Fish and Wildlife workers told her they would only be able to intervene if there was evidence of endangered species in the wooded
area, which she acknowledged doesn't seem to be the case.
She added she has asked CP if the trees could be uprooted and relocated to another part of the property, but they responded doing so would be too costly. as
would be relocating the railway crossing further down the track.
"It's cheaper for them to just remove the trees," she said.
Scott Strasser.
(because there was no image with original article)
(usually because it's been seen before)
provisions in Section 29 of the Canadian
Copyright Modernization Act.