Calgary Alberta - Canadian Pacific Railway Limited (CP) today issued the following statement in response to Canadian National's (CN)
commitment to divest Kansas City Southern's (KCS) line between New Orleans and Baton Rouge:
CN's commitment to divest this 70 mile line is clear recognition by CN that it and KCS have always been head-to-head competitors, contrary to CN's repeated
claims that the combination was end-to-end.
However, CN's commitment does not come close to solving the anti-competitive problems inherent in the proposed CN/KCS transaction.
In particular, this token divestment would not begin to address the competitive issues in the rail corridors running north from Louisiana and Mississippi
through America's heartland, where KCS and CN have historically competed.
It does not address many shippers and stations that are today served by both KCS and CN in markets like Omaha/Council Bluffs, Jackson, MS, Springfield, IL, and
St. Louis.
It does not address geographic competition between CN and KCS in numerous areas where each of them competes to handle similar commodities to/from different
shippers, terminals, and trans-loads in the same region.
And it does not address the impact a CN/KCS combination would have on customer access to CP routes serving the Upper Midwest and Canada.
Rail customers in all of these situations likely would see reduced competitive options as well as reduced service quality and infrastructure investments as a
result of the CN transaction.
If this divestment occurred, it is not clear it would be effective even in addressing the loss of competition for shippers on KCS' line between Baton Rouge
and New Orleans.
CN offers no details regarding to whom and on what terms the divestment would be carried out, despite those details mattering to competition.
And during the year and a half when CN would be seeking to close their acquisition of KCS, competition in this corridor would be diminished as CN and KCS
managers each would know that their railroads' profits flowed to the same owner, CN.
Furthermore, if CN is allowed to hold KCS in trust for the three-and-a-half years as it proposes, an arrangement that leaves CN the winner whether it competes
or not, shippers will lose competition during that entire period regardless of the outcome of the Surface Transportation Board approval process.
This goes directly to the concerns raised by the Department of Justice about incentives while in trust, and in our view, is inconsistent with the public
interest.
Author unknown.
(because there was no image with original article)
(usually because it's been seen before)
provisions in Section 29 of the Canadian
Copyright Modernization Act.