Pitt Meadows British Columbia - While it supports a much needed rail underpass that it describes as
"critical infrastructure," the City of Pitt Meadows will not fork out up to $50 million to help the project
cross the finish line.
Councillors voted unanimously on Tuesday to reaffirm their commitment to the Harris Road Underpass Project, but
declined the Vancouver Fraser Port Authority's request to become a funding partner and provide 25 percent of project
costs.
Residents who have spoken against Pitt Meadows' financial involvement have cited a "long-term tax burden" as
a concern.
"Council will continue to proactively advocate for federal funding to help close the funding gap and has received
strong regional and provincial support for this critical project that advances national, provincial, regional, and
local interests," Pitt Meadows Mayor Nicole MacDonald said in a Wednesday news release.
Once constructed, the Harris Road Underpass Project would separate road and rail traffic at Harris Road, reducing
congestion on the road that currently intersects CPKC's corridor.
According to the Port of Vancouver, a single train crossing at the intersection can block traffic for an average of
three minutes, with up to 40 rail crossing each weekday.
The proposed project includes a new four-lane underpass below the CP crossing at Harris Road and a new two-lane
overpass on Kennedy Road over the main rail line entrance to CP's Vancouver Intermodal Facility.
Construction was slated to begin this year, with completion in 2027 at the earliest.
When the project was first announced in 2018, its estimated cost was $63.3 million, without municipal
dollars.
Project costs have now more than tripled to over $195 million.
On the Port of Vancouver's website, the federal government, port authority, and CP are listed as funding
partners.
In a Wednesday statement, the Vancouver Fraser Port Authority said it is "disappointed" in the Pitt Meadow
council's decision and is reviewing the future of the project.
"The proposed underpass is located outside of the port authority's jurisdiction, at the intersection of a CP owned
and operated rail corridor, and City of Pitt Meadows owned and operated roadway," it wrote.
"As such, our role is to facilitate partnership and collaboration between project partners with relevant
jurisdictions and to provide partial funding to help ensure this project, of local and national importance, can be
realized."
The port authority said it remains committed to a meaningful relationship with the municipality.
Last month, the port authority went before Pitt Meadows councillors to outline affordability challenges with the
project, including higher construction costs, inflation, new seismic design and code requirements, and more challenging
environmental and archaeological conditions.
It indicated that without municipal funding support it can't break ground on the project.
According to the municipality, borrowing $49.6 million over 30 years to meet the port's funding request would have
resulted in a tax increase of about $9,000 for the average single-family home.
"If the Harris Road underpass does not go forward, Pitt Meadows would not receive noise mitigation nor the
relocation of heritage buildings, and CP still has the right to build additional tracks within their
right-of-way," Pitt Meadows said in a news release after the 28 Mar 2023 presentation by the port
authority.
"This will mean a continued increase in train traffic and delays at the Harris Road crossing."
On Wednesday, MacDonald said greenlighting the city's contribution would have set an "unreasonable precedent to
rely on a municipality to fund large-scale infrastructure projects that fall within federal jurisdiction and support
the national trade corridor."
Pitt Meadows has fewer than 20,000 residents and its entire 2023 budget, approved in December, was about $50
million.
CP declined to comment on the story, referring the matter to the Vancouver Fraser Port Authority.
Elizabeth McSheffrey.
(likely no image with original article)
(usually because it's been seen before)
provisions in Section 29 of the
Canadian Copyright Modernization Act.