Washington District of Columbia USA - Union Pacific is asking a federal district court to review
the decision by the Surface Transportation Board (STB) to approve the merger between Canadian Pacific and Kansas City
Southern (CPKC).
UP had expressed concerns during STB hearings on the merger that the board needed to impose conditions upon CP and KCS
that would ensure competition at interchanges.
"The merger of CPKC is likely to reduce competition and negatively impact shippers and stakeholders," UP
told FreightWaves in a statement on why it petitioned the U.S. Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia Circuit on
Wednesday.
"In approving the merger, the STB acknowledged these concerns, but did not adopt solutions to remedy the
harms."
STB had approved the merger between Class I railroads CP and KCS on 15 Mar 2023 and then last month, CP and KCS
finalized the merger, becoming Canadian Pacific Kansas City, or CPKC.
CPKC has said the merger would result in the first transcontinental railroad between Canada, the U.S., and Mexico that
would provide single-line service between the three countries.
In the two-page petition to the court, UP said, "UP seeks relief on the grounds that the agency action is in
excess of the Board's authority, that it is arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, and otherwise not in
accordance with law, and that it is not supported by substantial evidence. UP requests that this Court vacate the order
under review and grant such additional relief as may be necessary and appropriate."
In response to UP's action, CPKC told FreightWaves in a statement, "We don't know what UP's argument is, but in
our view, the STB conducted a comprehensive, thorough, and thoughtful review of the combination which produced the
right final decision clearly recognizing the combination's many benefits."
STB told FreightWaves it does not comment on pending litigation.
If the court sides with UP, then STB could have to reconsider what conditions to place upon CPKC that would ensure
competition.
Joanna Marsh.
(likely no image with original article)
(usually because it's been seen before)
provisions in Section 29 of the
Canadian Copyright Modernization Act.