Pitt Meadows British Columbia - CPKC needs the Harris Road underpass to ensure rail operations do
not violate Transport Canada’s Grade Crossing Regulations.
The Port of Vancouver and CPKC proposed an underpass at Harris Road not to help our community with horrible traffic
problems but because CPKC railway operations are restricted by Transport Canada's Railway Safety Act, Grade Crossing
Regulations section 97(2) which states: "It is prohibited for railway equipment to be left standing on a crossing
surface, or for switching operations to be conducted, in a manner that obstructs a public grade crossing, including by
the activation of the gate of a warning system, for more than five minutes when vehicular or pedestrian traffic is
waiting to cross it."
Switching operations refers to the process of making up and breaking up trains.
This is what happens over Harris Road when CPKC is building or breaking up trains as a result of operations at their
intermodal facility in Pitt Meadows.
CPKC is in violation of the regulations every time they build trains and block the crossing for more than five minutes
when vehicles or pedestrians are waiting to cross.
We all know this happens on a regular basis and leads to much frustration.
These regulations are misunderstood by many.
People seem to think that the train needs to be stopped for more than five minutes and that if it moves slightly the
clock starts ticking again.
This is not the case when it comes to switching operations being conducted.
The maximum time the crossing can be blocked for switching operations is five minutes if vehicles or pedestrians are
waiting to cross.
It is important for our community to understand these regulations and how CPKC is violating them.
It is only then that CPKC will be held accountable for resolving the issue in a manner that protects our
community.
Pitt Meadows residents should not be required to fund infrastructure that CPKC requires to be compliant with federal
regulations.
Heather Anderson.
(likely no image with original article)
(usually because it's been seen before)
provisions in Section 29 of the
Canadian Copyright Modernization Act.