Laval Quebec - A federal judge has found CPKC to be in contempt of court after the company forced
train crews to work excessively long hours in violation of a court order to abide by the collective agreement and
Transport Canada regulations.
The contempt motion was filed by the union representing rail workers, the Teamsters Canada Rail Conference
(TCRC).
Crew fatigue is a well-documented safety hazard in the rail industry.
From the early 1990s until mid-2022, the Transportation Safety Board of Canada has identified fatigue as a factor in at
least 32 train derailments and other accidents.
Rail workers are constantly on call and may work no longer than 12 hours under Transport Canada regulations, or 10
hours under certain provisions of the collective agreement.
The judge found "beyond a reasonable doubt" that the rail company "intentionally" overworked train
crews in 22 incidents of the 38 presented.
However, the judge also noted that "CPKC's own evidence was that thousands of situations continue to occur
annually" where train crews are not relieved from work in time.
"CPKC recklessly puts lives on the line in forcing so many train crews to work longer than allowed. They do this
because they operate under the dangerous delusion that they are above the law, and that it's OK to ignore the court
orders on safety issues. This company needs to smarten up and stop putting profits over people before another tragedy
occurs," said the National President of Teamsters Canada, Francois Laporte.
"Despite everything they say, rail companies in this country just don't take safety seriously enough. Another
Lake Megantic can happen at any moment, and Ottawa seems unable or unwilling to do anything about it. Canadians can
count on the Teamsters to fight tooth and nail for rail safety. We will never back down when lives and communities are
at stake," said the President of the TCRC, Paul Boucher.
The penalties will be determined in a separate hearing.
Author unknown.
(likely no image with original article)
(usually because it's been seen before)
provisions in Section 29 of the
Canadian Copyright Modernization Act.