Port Coquitlam British Columbia - A railway conductor has won his job back after being fired for
having trace amounts of cocaine in his body at the Port Coquitlam rail yard.
After a recent hearing between the Teamsters Canada Rail Conference (TCRC) and the Canadian Pacific Kansas City
Railway (CPKC), formerly known as Canadian Pacific, an arbitrator ruled there was no just cause for the
discipline.
The conductor was ordered reinstated without conditions, loss of seniority or benefits, and and is to be paid lost
wages.
"The positive test is one piece of evidence and demonstrates some use of cocaine several days before, it does not
establish impairment by cocaine while on the job," the arbitrator said in the decision.
"As a result, there was no just cause to discipline the conductor for his illegal drug use which had occurred
several days before his shift began."
The incident occurred in the early morning hours of 5 Feb 2021 and involved a train running through a switch at the
west end of the Port Coquitlam yard.
A miscommunication between the train's brakeman and engineer occurred, and the conductor was not positioned on the
footboard as required by operating procedures.
The conductor testified that he was in the locomotive doing paperwork as the train was stopped at a red light, and he
had not given the go-ahead to the engineer.
He was subject to a post-incident substance test later that day, which included an oral fluid swab test and a urine
test.
The former was negative, but the result of the urine test was just below the screening concentration limit set in
company policy.
In follow up interviews, the conductor admitted to cocaine use with some friends following a shift on 1 Feb 2021, but
added he rarely uses the drug and had not used it since.
He said he had never reported for work under the influence of a prohibited substance, or been impaired during his
shifts.
The conductor was fired on 24 Feb 2021.
The railway was relying on its policy stating that all employees must report fit to work, and be able to safely and
effectively perform their duties.
They argued the conductor's ingestion of cocaine could still be affecting his performance due to the residual effects
during the "crash phase" of the drug.
Substantial memory and cognitive impairments, such as decreased alertness, poor and divided attention, reaction time,
and concentration can last from one to five days, the company argued.
The railway also highlighted the position of conductor as a "safety critical role."
The union argued that the investigation was not conducted in a fair or impartial manner, the company had failed to meet
the burden of proof, and had ignored past labour precedents on drug tests.
Past arbitrations have established that the mere presence of drug metabolites does not establish just cause for
discipline, according to the union.
While the arbitrator acknowledged the company has a legitimate and pressing legal obligation to safely run the
business, the issue has to be balanced with what individuals choose to do in their private lives.
A significant body of jurisprudence exists to determine whether an individual is impaired, the arbitrator noted, adding
no evidence of that was presented by the company.
"To find that this grievor was impaired by cocaine, either by the initial high or the crash from cocaine, would
require evidence," the arbitrator said.
Patrick Penner.
(likely no image with original article)
(usually because it's been seen before)
provisions in Section 29 of the Canadian
Copyright Modernization Act.