Spences Bridge British Columbia - A First Nation in BC's interior is demanding accountability from
railway companies, claiming they are responsible for several fires on band land over the past three
months.
The Cook's Ferry Indian Band, whose band office is located in Spences Bridge, about 180 kilometres northeast of
Vancouver, says there have been five fires between 30 Apr 2024 and 7 Jul 2024 along rail lines in and around their
community.
The chief of the band worries that without proper prevention and fire suppression efforts on the part of rail
companies, there could be disaster for the community.
In a statement posted to Band Chief Christine Walkem's Facebook page, the band alleges one of the fires occurred on a
CN line, while the other four happened on a line belonging to CPKC.
"These fires have caused significant distress and disruption in our community," the statement from Chief
Walkem reads.
The band worries the companies are not committed to fire prevention and response.
"Stop waiting for disaster to happen and to be told what is necessary to do the right thing."
The band points to the Lytton fire of 2021, which destroyed the nearby village of Lytton and forced the evacuation of
several communities, including Cook's Ferry Indian Band.
The statement says the Cook's Ferry Indian Band believes that fire "originated from railway
operations."
"While each of these fires seem small in comparison to the devastating Lytton Creek fire, concerns and impacts
must not be dismissed," the statement says.
Cause of Lytton Fire Not Yet Determined
The cause of the Lytton fire has not yet been determined, but locals have alleged seeing sparks flying from a nearby
rail line before it began.
Last summer, the BC Supreme Court rejected a class action lawsuit against the two rail companies.
The plaintiffs, both Lytton residents, alleged CN and CPKC were responsible for the fire that destroyed their
community.
The judge said there was no evidence to support the claim that the rail companies were responsible for starting the
fire.
In October 2021, investigators with the Transportation Safety Board said they did not find evidence that trains
running near the village of Lytton were responsible for the fire.
In a statement, CPKC told CBC that it has reached out to the band to discuss the fires and the company's response to
them.
The company says all four fires referenced are being investigated by the BC Wildfire Service.
The BC Wildfire service says it is investigating fires in the area on 24 May 2024, 1 Jul 2024, 4 Jul 2024, and
7 Jul 2024, all of which line up with the First Nation's dates.
However, the wildfire service did not have information about the 30 Apr 2024 fire, which the band says was started on a
CPKC rail line.
CPKC says a helicopter with a line and bucket contracted by the company was the first on scene to the 24 May 2024 and
7 Jul 2024 fires.
The company said it has its own firefighting equipment, including multiple fire suppression trains.
In 2021, the company gave the Cook's Ferry Indian Band a 5,000 gallon water bladder, and this year, it offered another
one, CPKC says.
However, in its statement, the First Nation says the bladder is small and not equipped to fight wildfires.
In an email, CN confirmed it sent a letter to the Cook's Ferry Indian Band and shared its plan for fire prevention and
response.
In the letter, the company says there is no evidence to suggest the fire on 4 Jul 2024 was caused by CN
operations.
It also suggested the fire originated 46 metres away from the tracks.
The company told CBC News that they invited the Cook's Ferry Indian Band to offer comments on their extreme weather
plan, which speaks to prevention, monitoring, and response to wildfire risks for extreme fire danger in any given area,
in 2022.
"While Cook's Ferry did not provide comments at the time, we continue to welcome their comments that would improve
the safety of the communities in which we operate," a CN spokesperson said.
"We have offered to meet with the Chief and the CFIB leadership at their earliest convenience."
Author unknown.
(likely no image with original article)
(usually because it's been seen before)
provisions in Section 29 of the
Canadian Copyright Modernization Act.